![]() |
| Photo credit: FL4Y on Flickr |
So after reading my
post on first sentences, a certain fabulous blogger suggested that I write
a post on the choice between present and past tense, which, in my opinion, is
totally brilliant and a bit of a wonder that I hadn’t already done so already. However,
I’ve come to realize that this post is going to be enormously long if I try to
cover both, so while today’s post will primarily focus on present tense,
Monday’s post will cover past.
Quick note: for the sake of this post I’m going to focus on
first-person POV, but the same principles apply to third-person as well.
Stylistically, the differences between past and present
tense are pretty subtle—and both function well in their respective novels. Books
like The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins, Shatter Me by Tahereh Mafi, Across the Universe by Beth Revis and The Girl of Fire and Thorns by Rae Carson were all successful with
their use of present tense while books like The Fault in Our Stars by John
Green, Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close by Jonathan Safran Foer, Immanuel’s Veins by Ted Dekker and The Unbecoming of Mara Dyer by
Michelle Hodkin worked well with past tense. (Note: I haven’t fully read all of the books I mentioned, but I’ve at
least read samples if not the whole thing, and found the voices to be
particularly interesting).
So what’s the difference between the two? Why use one over
the other?
Having read (and written in) plenty of both, the biggest
difference that stands out to me is the sense of immediacy and closeness. Now
I’m aware that closeness isn’t really
a technical term to describe writing and I should probably use another more
professional-sounding word, but closeness is the word I currently have in my
head. So.
By “closeness” I mean the proverbial distance between the
reader and the narrator. I’m sure you’ve all read a novel and found that the
narrator felt distant, which made it difficult for you to connect or empathize
with the protagonist (and you probably put the book down unless you were forced
or felt particularly compelled to read it for whatever reason). That’s the
distance I’m talking about—the closeness.
In my experience at least, I’ve found that this closeness
correlates directly to the tense the work is written in, and the relationship
is something like this:
![]() |
| So...this is a little hard to read, but hopefully you get the idea. |
Now, that’s not to say that books written in third-person
past or even third-person omniscient can’t create a close relationship to the
reader—it just in many cases takes a little more effort on both the writer and
reader’s part.
You see, when a novel is written in present tense, the
reader is in essence experiencing the events of the book at the same time as
the narrator, and it’s this feeling of going through the plot together (immediacy) that tends to
create an instantly closer relationship. Books written in past tense of course
can create the same sort of relationship—as I said the differences between the
two are very subtle—but the effect of the narrator recounting the story (as is
the case in novels written in past tense) is a half-step farther than the narrator
experiencing the novel with the
reader.
The immediacy of present tense works particularly well in fast-paced,
action-packed novels—which is why I think it worked so well in The Hunger Games. For these kind of
novels, present-tense adds an extra edge—the characters are going through their
battles with the reader. The
protagonist hasn’t experienced this already—and thus isn’t telling us about a
battle three years ago that they very clearly survived from or else they
wouldn’t be around to tell the story—so there’s an added sense of vulnerability.
Although it’s very rare for protagonists to die, the sense that things are
happening now can give the added feel
that anything could happen—even, possibly (although unlikely), the death of the
protagonist.
But like every tense, there are weaknesses you must be aware
of.
Present tense (especially first-person present tense) can be
more difficult for some readers to adjust to. Whereas it’s reasonable to think
that a narrator may be telling you about something they experienced before (as
is the case with novels written in past tense), the idea that the narrator is
actually standing right there in front of you narrating exactly what they’re
doing right now is a hurdle that
readers must get over in order to enjoy the story. Obviously no one (sane) goes
around announcing to some invisible audience everything that they’re doing as
they do it—which for some readers is a fact that makes it rather difficult to
enjoy novels written in first-person present tense.
For this reason, present-tense can be a little more
difficult to write convincingly. Your voice and story must be strong enough to
make readers overlook the fact that realistically, the protagonist should not
be describing everything that’s going on at this present time.
If done well, however, present-tense is a perfectly viable
option that can function really well for certain types of novels.
What do you think? Have you ever written in present tense? What novels
have you read that used present tense well (or that didn’t)?


24 comments:
I write present tense whenever a story gives me even the vaguest of excuses. It just seems to come more easily to me than past. In my current WIP, there's a frame story, where the main character is on trial, relating past events, so I used present tense for the trial to emphasise the separation (an obscure children's book I can't remember the name or author of I read fifteen years ago did more or less this to amazing effect, and I've never forgotten).
I actually feel it's non-action scenes that work best with present tense, though; sometimes that additional closeness really brings up the tension in what would otherwise be dry conversation.
I'm a fan of present tense myself and have also found it comes rather easily. I suppose it's as close to stream of consciousness as it gets.
You make a good point about non-action scenes--the additional closeness absolutely can emphasize the tension that might be a little harder to punctuate on in past tense.
Great post! I've found it very difficult to write in first person, present tense. I once heard a famous author say that you can base a writer on their writing skills by their successful effort at first person, present tense. I guess it's just that hard to write? I'm not sure, but it is a challenge for me. One that I would very much like to overcome someday. Anywho. Loved this post and I love your blog! Always a wealth of information. Thanks!
Fantastic post! I just finished my first venture with present tense (a short story) and it was more difficult than I expected. But it was right for the story, and I will often slip into present tense writing when I'm crafting a particularly intense scene. But for the most part, past tense works for me. (Also Tahareh's book is far from action packed, but the immediacy in her head made present tense a good choice, I think.)
Interesting thing I've found about 1st person: it really only works well for silent reading. If you're reading aloud to an audience, it's jarring for them to hear you read "I...I...I" all the time. I never noticed this until reading a first person story to my kids and they commented about how strange it was (even though they read 1st person stories themselves and have no trouble with it).
(BTW LOVE Beth Revis' alternating 1st person in AtU and can't wait to read Million Suns!)
I think like anything, the biggest challenge is to write first person present well--it certainly takes some practice and exposure to it first.
I absolutely agree that the immediacy in Tahereh's book worked beautifully. I don't think it would have had quite the same effect had it been written in past tense.
That's a really interesting observation. I hadn't really thought of it that way before, but come to think of it, it does feel a little strange to read first person novels aloud to an audience. I suppose it seems natural for silent reading as we think of ourselves in those terms (our inner voice so-to-speak works in first person).
And funnily enough, I didn't think I was going to like the alternating first person in AtU and I was totally wrong--it worked better than I could have imagined. Can't wait until I get my hands on a copy of A Million Suns!
I'm with Ric. I find it easier to write present tense than past. I'm not sure why that is, especially when most people struggle with present tense.
I feel like present tense is easier (for some of us anyway) to get down on paper, but more difficult (or time-consuming, at least) to polish into something well-written. At least, that's been my experience.
I think it also depends on the story. Some narration styles, characters, and story work much better with present tense. But I do think it's harder to write!
I absolutely agree that it depends on the story. Some books work beautifully in present tense and others much better in past tense. It all depends on the style and voice of the novel.
I'm intrigued to see how many people find writing in present tense easy and how many find it difficult. Judging by the comments it seems to be nearly 50/50 so far, with a few extra votes on finding it difficult--interesting!
I rarely notice tense unless it is done poorly. Like I read Hunger Games and don't think I even noticed it was in present tense. So when I read I don't really see much of a difference between closeness and urgency with the tense or POV.
I'm so glad you're covering this topic, Ava. I've not yet fully written a story in present tense, though it's interesting to me, I've started several that way, then switched them when they got going. I think it was that immediacy of involvement with the character that made it feel a good place to start for me. But it is unusual, still, and so I ended switching to past once I was well into it.
I've read some present tense stories, and I agree with you, the writing needs to be very strong!
As long as it's not also in second person. That's the line!
It's funny that you say this becasue I once had my first page read and critiqued before an conference and their biggest complaint was that was first person present tense. Go figure.
BTW, I noticed you have my old blog on your sidebar, just thought you should know :)
I've actually been inspired by this to do a blog post of my own on present tense, so I'll let you know when that's ready :)
Present tense is a hard one. I generally don't like it. It's almost too much. I get exhausted as a reader.
I did write a flash fiction in present tense to get the feel for it. It is way hard to write too!
It's a subtle thing, but one that can work really well with some stories, as it did with The Hunger Games.
It's funny because I've found that I sometimes switch into present tense when I start really getting into the writing. I've found it to be one that I enjoy writing in, but it's certainly difficult to polish.
There's a reason I didn't include it on the closeness chart. :D
First person present tense is difficult for some readers to adjust to. That comes down to personal preference.
Also, I'll have to fix that. Thank you for the reminder! :)
Like most things, it's a matter of taste as well as stylistic preference. Some people find that they can adjust to it well, others (like yourself) find it exhausting or too difficult to connect to.
It seems present tense is one of those polarizing things as far as how easy it is to write--judging by the comments so far people find it either easy to write in or difficult with little in-between. Interesting!
Great! Definitely give me the link when it's up! :)
I actually really like present tense. Updike used 3rd person present well in Run Rabbit Run. You might like that, although women tend to be put off by him.
Anyway, Updike said the same thing you do. Present-tense gives the text an immediacy. There's this sense that the whole future of the novel becomes unstable because you don't really know what's going to happen because the narrator doesn't know what's going to happen.
I haven't read much Updike, but as I do happen to like present tense, I'll have to keep that in mind. I like the way you described the future of the novel in present tense--unstable. It certainly does feel that way when not even the protagonist knows what will happen, something that I've found I enjoy with present-tense novels.
Post a Comment