![]() |
Photo credit: tosaytheleast in Flickr |
As you might have guessed, this is one of those posts.
This time, however, I’d like to hear from you guys. Because
while I have some ideas on the topic, I don’t really write all that many short
stories, and truth be told, it’s been a couple of years since I’ve written one
(which, come to think of it, should be remedied), but I suspect some of you
lovely readers are more recently acquainted with the short story writing
experience. So. Here we go.
The proposed question, as many of you astute readers
probably inferred from the title, was how to tell the difference between an
idea better suited for a short story than a novel.
I find this question to be particularly interesting because it’s been a long while since I’ve really even allowed myself to consider whether or not an idea would be appropriate for a short story—to me, it’s been more of a question of whether or not I could write an entire novel based on whatever premise rose from the depths of my mind, and those that failed the idea worthiness test of time were labeled unworthy and discarded and ignored. I kind of imagine Odin’s booming voice as he screams, “YOU ARE NOT WORTHY,” at Thor, but that’s beside the point.
I find this question to be particularly interesting because it’s been a long while since I’ve really even allowed myself to consider whether or not an idea would be appropriate for a short story—to me, it’s been more of a question of whether or not I could write an entire novel based on whatever premise rose from the depths of my mind, and those that failed the idea worthiness test of time were labeled unworthy and discarded and ignored. I kind of imagine Odin’s booming voice as he screams, “YOU ARE NOT WORTHY,” at Thor, but that’s beside the point.
Getting back to the question, though, once you’ve determined
whether your idea is worth writing about at all (again, the test of time is a
good indicator), a large part of the difference between short story ideas and
novel ideas is the scope.
You see, novel ideas have to be big—and I don’t mean that they have to have explosions and
ridiculously awesome action scenes—I just mean that while you’re working with
your new idea, you have to be able to develop enough nuances, subplots and
layers to sustain 80,000 (or however many) words. And sometimes, especially if
you’re a pantser, it’s a little hard to tell if your idea is going to survive
three hundred-some-odd pages or if you’re going to hit page fifteen and say,
“You know what? Maybe this idea isn’t worth a novel after all.” But the first
step in answering the question of whether or not your idea is enough to sustain
a novel, lies, I believe, in determining the scope of your idea.
Let’s take a look at an example.
The Hunger Games
is big. There’s no way Suzanne Collins would have been able to as effectively
fit all the setup, relationships, celebrity status of the tributes, horror of
the games, rebellion against the Capitol and repercussions thereof in fifteen
pages (and I don’t mean written in summary-like synopsis form, I mean written
as an actual story).
However, way before The
Hunger Games was the short story The
Lottery written by Shirley Jackson in 1948, which certainly has many
similarities to the beginning of The
Hunger Games (you can read it
for free online, if you’re interested).
The difference between the two? You guessed it—the scope of the idea.
While The Hunger Games
included various subplots (i.e.: the Katniss-Peeta-Gale love triangle, among
others) as well as an in-depth look at the glamorization of the hunger games in
the Capitol that only made the brutality of the games (in my opinion) that much
more powerful in its effect on the reader, The
Lottery included set-up, foreshadowing, some characterization and, erm, the
results of the lottery (you’ll have to read it if you haven’t already to know
what I mean). The former was way too big to be shoved into a short story
format, while the latter fit very comfortable in a little over 3000 words.
So, in short, the main difference to me between a short
story and novel idea lies in the scope of the idea. If you think you can fit it
in fifteen pages, then it’s probably not worth dragging out into three hundred;
but on the other hand if you think it might be difficult to condense into a
shorter story without losing anything, you might want to consider writing a
novel (or at least a novella) instead.
Those are my thoughts, but how do you tell between a short story
and novel idea? Have you ever had a short story turn into a novel, or a novel
idea become a short story, instead?