Photo credit: Rubin 110 on Flickr |
And your
characters are no different, or at least, they shouldn't be.
It seems like a
no-brainer, especially when we're writing our main characters— most of are
aware that we need to know their fears and dreams and all the little
intricacies that bring them to life.
But what about
our less important characters? I don't mean the second lead here, I mean the
bell boys and bus drivers and bartenders that populate your world. Writing them
tends to be a secondary thing— characters that arise out of necessity and
convenience rather than careful planning and development.
But even our
least important characters have their own personality, experiences and lives
and if you aren't utilizing it, you're missing out on a huge opportunity.
Writing less
important characters doesn't have to be boring— in fact if it is boring,
you probably have a flat character on your hands that needs some revising. Let's
take a quick look at a hypothetical example. Say you're writing a scene in
which your male MC (Mike) and female secondary (Sara) are going to have a
conversation at a bar downtown, so naturally you need a bartender. In your
first round of writing you slap down Bartender A.
Bartender A is
named Greg. He's butch and bald and over-muscled and smells like beer. He
grunts when Mike orders his drink and hands his order over silently. Your
characters have their conversation and are able to ignore Bartender A easily.
It could work.
But it's boring. Let's try Bartender B.
Bartender B is
named Rachel. She's young and pretty and smiles at Mike when he orders his
drink and even flirts back a little when he says something flirtatious, which
makes Sara jealous. A little better, but still stereotypical.
Bartender C is
named Holland. She's in her late twenties and relatively attractive, but hides
behind her rectangle glasses, stutters a little and ignores Mike when he says
something flirtatious. She interrupts their conversation to ask Sara if she'd
like a refill frequently but never asks Mike.
Then she leaves
Sara her number.
We could go on
and on with various bartenders, but I think out of the three we know which one
is going to leave the biggest impression.
Every character
you write has their own motivations, fears and desires and provides an
opportunity be memorable. Are you using your minor characters to their fullest
potential?
Who are your
favorite minor characters? What made them your favorite?
More goodness on this subject from my fav anonymous fantasy critic, Limyaael:
ReplyDeletehttp://limyaael.livejournal.com/131075.html
&
http://limyaael.insanejournal.com/310529.html
Nice links! Thanks for sharing. :)
ReplyDeleteI totally rolled my eyes when you mentioned the last bartender. I guess the impression was strong enough to cause a reaction in me :)
ReplyDeletelol I didn't say it had to be a positive impression :D
ReplyDeleteGreat to read this. I like your idea here of missing opportunities by not knowing the minor characters well enough. They do play a role in moving the action forward - and I think the narrative feels more authentic when the minor characters aren't just puppets.
ReplyDeleteAgreed! I think it's one of the things that made Harry Potter such a popular series--even the minor characters were interesting and fully developed.
ReplyDeleteMy two favorite minor characters right now are Fflweder Fflam and Gurgy from the Prydain chronicles. They are funny, loyal, and loveable. But they also have depth which is great!
ReplyDeleteI promoted a minor character into a protagonist in the next book because he was cooperative with my vision.
ReplyDeleteGood point. You can really enhance a scene using this technique.
ReplyDeleteWhen I first submitted a novel I was told that I had carboard cut-out secondary characters. It wasn't something I fully understood until I looked around my life an analyzed the 'secondary' characters in my life. Turns out they've got quite the personalities themselves! I can't believe how much it helped in writing!!!
ReplyDeleteFabulous blog!!!
YA Tournament of Heroines: Hermione is my Heroine... Care to join?
I've never really though about that before - good point.
ReplyDeleteAlthough, do you think that trying to stress or show the traits and mannerism of minor characters (who really have very little part in the story) could detract from the actually story or event at hand (in this case, Mike and Sara's conversation)?
I've promoted minor characters as well. Sometimes they really surprise you if you give them the chance! :)
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Jen! Sometimes it's hard to see those kind of flaws until someone else points them out to us. We're all probably guilty of writing a couple flat characters throughout our writing journey (I know I certainly am), and the best thing we can do is be aware of the tendency so we remember to take the time to get to know every character. :)
ReplyDeleteLike everything else, I'd say it requires a balance, but I think if done correctly, the emphasis could actually add to the scene. Rather than being invisible, minor characters could add another layer of tension or conflict (or even symbolism) that would not have been there otherwise.
ReplyDeleteOf course, there's a time and place for everything, but it's certainly good to be aware of the opportunities every character (minor or not) presents.
What makes Holland any less flat than the other two? Because she gives Sara her number? Rachel could've flirted with Mike all night and then left Sara her number, too. Is that less flat? What if GREG left Mike his number? I'm not sure this action is more-or-less just surprising and unexpected due to social norms, rather than fleshing out the bartender with, essentially, a "backstory" (dreams, fears, etc). If you want Mike to get hit on, instead of a girl bartender, make it a boy. If you want Sara to get hit on, make it a girl. Is that any less flat, or just playing on reader expectations?
ReplyDeleteYou make a great point, Jessica. I suppose my example was more playing on reader expectations to make them memorable rather than fleshing them out with a full background to give them depth.
ReplyDeleteWhat I was mostly trying to get at was that every character provides opportunities to do something memorable--to be unexpected or funny or quirky or anything but the invisible I'm-just-a-bartender (taxi driver, bell boy, etc.) whose sole purpose is whatever job you give them.
Media is full of minor characters who were supposed to disappear and then became fan favorites. Spike from Buffy being the example that most often comes to mind. He was supposed to die after two episodes.
ReplyDeleteBabylon 5 also had a couple great minor characters. They didn't really impact the big plots, but they acted as observers and audience surrogates, commenting on things from without as they happened. To me that's one of the big draws of the minor character.
I never watched Buffy, but I've certainly heard of that happening and I know I've on more than one occasion really loved minor characters in books I've read.
ReplyDeleteFinnick Odair from The Hunger Games trilogy, for example, is one of my favorites.
For good or ill, I'm way better at picking these things out of TV and movies than books...
ReplyDeleteFor whatever reason, books tend to stick in my memory better. I tried to think of a TV show or movie I could use as an example, but The Hunger Games came to mind first. :)
ReplyDelete